Sector
Fishery
Indonesia, boasting the title of the world’s largest archipelagic country with a vast sea area of 5.8 million square kilometers, stands as one of the largest producers and suppliers in the global fisheries market. The abundance of sea area provides Indonesia with a wealth of fisheries products, making fisheries a national leading sector in the country.
View moreFishery
Indonesia, boasting the title of the world’s largest archipelagic country with a vast sea area of 5.8 million square kilometers, stands as one of the largest producers and suppliers in the global fisheries market. The abundance of sea area provides Indonesia with a wealth of fisheries products, making fisheries a national leading sector in the country.
There are 23 regions where fisheries stand out as a leading sector, supporting local economies and providing food security. These regions encompass Aceh, Bengkulu, Riau, Lampung, South Sumatra, Central Java, Bali, West Nusa Tenggara, East Nusa Tenggara, Central Kalimantan, South Kalimantan and North Kalimantan. Other regions include Central Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, West Sulawesi, North Sulawesi, Gorontalo, Maluku, North Maluku, Papua, West Papua, and Bangka Belitung.
In 2022, Indonesia’s fisheries sector contributed a total of Rp505 trillion to the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Building this strong foundation, the country set an ambitious target of reaching US$7.2 billion in fishery exports by the end of 2023. Previously, total fishery product exports had hovered around US$5 billion to US$6 billion.
Supporting the sector’s contribution to the country’s GDP is its production. Throughout the third quarter of 2023, Indonesia’s fisheries production totaled 24.74 million tons. This figure includes both capture fisheries and aquaculture. In aquaculture, the main commodities are seaweed cultivation and shrimp cultivation, while in capture fisheries, the main commodities are tuna, skipjack tuna, and mackerel tuna.
Furthermore, Indonesia’s fisheries sector is experiencing a surge in investment. By the third quarter of 2023, the sector had attracted a total of Rp9.56 trillion in investment, with significant contributions from a mix of domestic sources at Rp5.32 trillion, foreign investors at Rp1.4 trillion, and credit sources at Rp2.84 trillion. Notably, China is the largest foreign investor, contributing Rp370.74 billion, followed by Malaysia with Rp240.4 billion, and Switzerland with Rp152.89 billion, highlighting the increasing international interest in Indonesia’s fisheries potential.
While Indonesia boasts impressive fisheries production and growing investments in its fisheries sector, it is vital to uphold fisheries regulations. These regulations ensure that this valuable sector thrives alongside healthy marine ecosystems. It is reported that Indonesia is scheduled to enforce a new fisheries policy in 2025, which will see quotas assigned to industrial, local, and non-commercial fishers across six designated fishing zones, covering all 11 fisheries management areas (FMAs) in Indonesia. The new quota system responds to a worrying rise in overexploited FMAs, which have increased to 53 percent from 44 percent in 2017.
Latest News
Danantara Indonesia has announced plans to consolidate 15 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and their logistics arms into a single “super” logistics entity in an effort to address longstanding structural issues in Indonesia’s state-owned logistics sector. The consolidation spans multiple segments, from railway distribution to fertilizer distribution, and combines both profitable and loss-making firms under the ambition of building a more integrated and efficient national logistics backbone.
According to the plan, the consolidation includes Pupuk Indonesia Logistik and Semen Indonesia Logistik, both of which recorded significant losses in their recent financial reports. Pupuk Indonesia Logistik posted losses of Rp 90.52 billion (US5.24 million) in 2024, while Semen Indonesia Logistik reported losses of Rp 30.29 billion in the same year, which then widened to Rp 188.35 billion in 2025.
This financial strain is closely tied to policy mandates imposed on these firms. In the case of Pupuk Indonesia and its logistics arm, subsidized fertilizer is sold at government-set prices that remain far below market rates, even as the cost of imported raw materials such as phosphate rock and diammonium phosphate, along with other feedstocks, has risen in recent years. Prices initially surged during the pandemic and increased again amid conflict in the Middle East. This persistent mismatch between controlled selling prices and rising production and distribution costs, compounded by the large volumes required under Indonesia’s subsidy program, has continued to pressure margins across the fertilizer supply chain.
A similar pattern can be seen at Semen Indonesia and its logistics subsidiary, which have played a major role in supporting large-scale infrastructure development, particularly projects classified under the government’s National Strategic Projects (PSN) program introduced during the administration of former president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo. While these projects have generated demand for cement and logistics services, many have operated under thin margins or even losses due to pricing pressures and execution constraints. As a result, participation in these state-driven initiatives has not always translated into financial sustainability, contributing to the broader pattern of losses across construction and logistics SOEs.
On the other end of the spectrum, several profitable logistics SOEs are expected to help offset weaker entities under the consolidation scheme. These include Pos Indonesia, which will serve as the holding company for the new logistics entity, alongside Pelindo Terminal Petikemas, ASDP Indonesia Ferry, Pelni, KAI Logistik and Integrasi Logistik Cipta Solusi. All of these companies have recorded consistent profits since at least 2023.
However, this profitability is not necessarily the result of stronger operational efficiency or healthy market competition. While struggling SOEs face rigid policies that suppress margins through subsidized pricing schemes or participation in low-margin national projects, stronger-performing firms benefit from regulatory structures that grant them protected, and often exclusive, access to lucrative market segments.
Take Pos Indonesia as an example. Despite losing market share in the consumer parcel business to on-demand delivery services such as J&T Express and Shopee Express, its profitability remains supported by regulatory advantages. As the state postal operator, Pos Indonesia retains exclusive access to government social assistance distribution programs such as the Family Hope Program (PKH) and staple food packages (Sembako) in remote regions, handles official state documents and passport deliveries, and operates the country’s only nationwide postal financial network through PosPay under a universal service obligation mandate.
Similarly, Pelindo Terminal Petikemas functions as the dominant container terminal operator across major Indonesian ports following the 2021 merger of Pelindo. Its profitability is supported by regulations that consolidate container handling operations under its network, leaving shippers with limited alternatives.
The same dynamic applies to ASDP Indonesia Ferry, which maintains a statutory monopoly over most roll-on/roll-off ferry routes connecting Sumatra, Java, Bali and other major islands. Private operators cannot enter these strategic routes without government approval, making ASDP’s profitability heavily reliant on regulatory protection.
The remaining seven logistics SOEs involved in the consolidation have not publicly disclosed their financial statements. They include Pelindo Solusi Logistik, Garuda Indonesia Logistik, Varuna Tirta Prakasya, Djakarta Lloyd, BGR Logistik Indonesia, Angkasa Pura Kargo and Aerojasa Cargo.
Unless the government addresses the dependence of some SOEs on policy protection to remain profitable, while easing the pricing pressures that continue to burden struggling firms, the merger risks becoming a bailout mechanism that masks inefficiencies rather than resolving them.
