Sector

Energy

Indonesia possesses vast, distributed, and diverse energy resources. The country’s energy subsectors include gas, clean water, and electricity, with demand projected to increase to 464 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2024 and further increase to 1,885 TWh by 2060. The use of renewable energy is a top priority and the government has set ambitious goals in the General Planning for National Energy (RUEN) and General Planning for National Electricity (RKUN) to integrate 23 percent renewable energy into the national energy mix by 2025. At least US$41.8 billion of investments are needed to fully realize the goal.

View more

Energy

Indonesia possesses vast, distributed, and diverse energy resources. The country’s energy subsectors include gas, clean water, and electricity, with demand projected to increase to 464 terawatt-hours (TWh) by 2024 and further increase to 1,885 TWh by 2060. The use of renewable energy is a top priority and the government has set ambitious goals in the General Planning for National Energy (RUEN) and General Planning for National Electricity (RKUN) to integrate 23 percent renewable energy into the national energy mix by 2025. At least US$41.8 billion of investments are needed to fully realize the goal.

Despite having a renewable energy potential estimated at around 3,000 gigawatts (GW), current utilization is merely about 12.74 GW or 3 percent. This renewable energy potential includes solar energy, which is widely spread across Indonesia, especially in East Nusa Tenggara, West Kalimantan, and Riau, with a potential of approximately 3,294 GW and utilization of 323 megawatts (MW). Another renewable energy, hydro energy, with a potential of 95 GW, is primarily found in North Kalimantan, Aceh, West Sumatra, North Sumatra, and Papua, with utilization reaching 6,738 MW.

Additionally, bioenergy, encompassing biofuel, biomass, and biogas, is distributed throughout Indonesia with a total potential of 57 GW and utilization of 3,118 MW. Wind energy (>6 m/s) found in East Nusa Tenggara, South Kalimantan, West Java, South Sulawesi, Aceh, and Papua has a substantial potential of 155 GW, with utilization of 154 MW.

Furthermore, geothermal energy, strategically located in the “Ring of Fire” region covering Sumatra, Java, Bali, Nusa Tenggara, Sulawesi, and Yogyakarta has a potential of 23 GW and utilization of 2,373 MW. Meanwhile, marine energy, with a potential of 63 GW, especially in Yogyakarta, East Nusa Tenggara, West Nusa Tenggara, and Bali, remains untapped.

Among the renewable energy sources and their potential, these projects entail significant investments. According to the Electricity Supply Business Plan (RUPTL) of the State Electricity Company (PLN), from 2021 to 2030, geothermal power plants require an investment of US$17.35 billion, large-scale solar power plants necessitate US$3.2 billion, hydropower plants require US$25.63 billion, and base renewable energy power plants require US$5.49 billion. Additionally, bioenergy power plants require an investment of US$2.2 billion, wind power plants US$1.03 billion, peaker power plants US$0.28 billion, and rooftop solar power plants IS$3 billion.

As of 2022, hydro and geothermal are the primary drivers of growth. Private entities had enhanced the capacity of hydro power by adding 603.66 MW in mini, micro, and standard hydro facilities, reaching a total of 2,459.72 MW. Meanwhile, the geothermal sector experienced a 412 MW increase over the last five years from the private sector, bringing the total capacity to 1,782.8 MW by 2022. Aside from these two renewable energy, sources solar energy has also presented significant opportunities, particularly given Indonesia's potential for floating solar systems on reservoirs and dams.

Furthermore, the country’s other national energy subsector of gas underscores Indonesia’s wealth in natural gas. Indonesia’s natural gas reserves are predominantly methane (80-95 percent), which can be used directly or processed into Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). However, demand has greatly increased over the past decade for Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). From 2018 to 2022, domestic LPG production reached between 1.9 to 2 million tons, which is insufficient to meet national needs, leading to increasing imports that reached 6.74 million tons in 2022.

Currently, the Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry is working to attract new investments for LPG refineries through a cluster-based business scheme for the construction or future development of new LPF refineries. The ministry has identified the potential of rich gas to produce an additional 1.2 million tons of LPG cylinders domestically.

Latest News

October 7, 2026

The government has formally changed how it manages its budget surplus funds (SAL), ending a nearly year-long debate over how the roughly Rp 400 trillion (US$22.4 billion) in surplus funds should be managed and put to use. Under Finance Ministry Regulation (PMK) No. 67/2026, excess government cash can now be placed with commercial banks or invested in government securities (SBN), giving the Finance Ministry greater flexibility in managing its cash.

The policy builds on a strategy introduced under then-finance minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa, who began moving SAL funds from Bank Indonesia (BI) into state-owned banks (Himbara) in September 2025 to increase banking liquidity and encourage lending. The policy subsequently became the subject of a tug-of-war between the Finance Ministry and BI as the government temporarily withdrew part of the funds from Himbara in June amid pressure on the rupiah, before returning them following concerns over bank liquidity. After Purbaya was removed as finance minister, there was speculation that the SAL funds would instead be returned to BI. The government has chosen a different approach, formalizing the flexibility to place the funds outside BI through PMK 67/2026.

With the new regulation, the Finance Ministry no longer needs to issue a separate Finance Minister Decree (KMK) for every SAL placement. Instead, PMK 67/2026 provides the regulatory basis for placements with commercial banks or investments in SBN, allowing the Finance Ministry to make such placements within the framework established by the regulation. This effectively turns what had previously required individual decisions into a more flexible and repeatable cash-management mechanism.

The case for returning more SAL funds to BI rests partly on the central bank's role in managing liquidity and stabilizing the rupiah. BI has continued to use a combination of foreign-exchange and liquidity-management instruments, including spot, domestic non-deliverable forward (DNDF) and offshore NDF transactions, while maintaining an accommodative macroprudential stance. At its September meeting, BI kept the BI-Rate at 5.75 percent, where it has stood since June, while continuing to emphasize rupiah stability and economic growth.

The pressure on the rupiah has also been reflected in BI's foreign-exchange reserves. Reserves fell from $156.5 billion at the end of 2025 to $144.9 billion in May 2026, before recovering to $146.5 billion at the end of August. That leaves reserves about $10 billion below their end-2025 level. BI said the August position was equivalent to 5.4 months of imports, or 5.3 months including government external-debt servicing, still well above the international adequacy benchmark of around three months.

Against this backdrop, proponents of keeping more government liquidity at BI can argue that doing so would give the central bank greater access to liquidity as it manages external pressures and the rupiah. But this raises a separate question: what has the SAL placement with Himbara actually achieved?

The government initially placed Rp 200 trillion of SAL funds with state-owned banks in September 2025, with the stated aim of strengthening bank liquidity and encouraging lending. The placement was later expanded. In June 2026, Purbaya announced that the government would increase the total placement to as much as Rp 400 trillion through additional Rp 100 trillion placements in two stages. By August, the government had added another Rp 70 trillion, bringing the total government funds in Himbara to nearly Rp 400 trillion, while extending the original Rp 200 trillion placement until July 2027.

The challenge is that additional liquidity does not necessarily translate into additional credit if demand for borrowing is weak. A significant portion of lending associated with Himbara has also been linked to government-backed programs. One prominent example is the Red and White Cooperatives, for which state-owned banks have provided around Rp 240 trillion in loans. The government has committed to repaying the principal and interest through the state budget of around Rp 40 trillion over the six-year loan period.

This does not necessarily mean Himbara lacks the capacity or willingness to lend. Rather, the more relevant question is whether private-sector credit demand is strong enough to absorb the additional liquidity. BI reported Rp 2.6 quadrillion in undisbursed loan facilities in May, equivalent to 22.41 percent of available credit lines, indicating that banks had substantial lending capacity that had not yet been taken up.

At the same time, the broader credit picture is not one of an outright contraction. BI's second-quarter Banking Survey recorded a weighted net balance of 93.08 percent for new credit disbursements, while lending rates also increased during the quarter. This suggests a more nuanced picture: banks are capable of expanding credit and actual lending continues to grow, but unused credit facilities remain substantial. The additional supply of liquidity, including SAL placements, may therefore be running ahead of underlying credit demand rather than being the binding constraint on lending.

This raises a question over whether commercial banks are where those funds are most useful in the current environment. While PMK 67/2026 gives the government greater flexibility to place excess cash in commercial banks or SBN, the underlying question is whether additional liquidity in Himbara is the most effective use of the funds when credit demand remains relatively weak. This is particularly relevant given BI’s simultaneous efforts to manage liquidity and support the rupiah through monetary and foreign-exchange interventions.

Read more
Load more