Sector
Finance
Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.
View moreFinance
Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.
With fintech paving the way forward, traditional banking followed suit by revolutionizing its services. From 2022 to 2023, the banking industry’s fund distribution increased by 6.28 percent, source of funds increased by 6.33 percent, and total assets in the industry grew by 6.98 percent, reaching a total of US$8.22 trillion. Moreover, even regional banks have been benefitting from this wave of innovation. For the same period from 2022 to 2023, the regional banking sector saw a 7.67 percent in distributed funds, an 8.08 percent increase in source of funds, and a 7.52 percent increase in total assets, reaching a total of US$137.96 billion.
Innovations in Indonesia’s finance sector extend beyond financial services. On September 2023, the Indonesian monetary authority, Bank Indonesia (BI), introduced three pro-market monetary instruments that function as short-term fixed income securities with high coupon rates. The three instruments, SRBI, SUVBI, and SUVBI, were able to collect Rp 409 trillion (US$25.2 billion), US$2.31 billion, and US$387 million, respectively.
Particularly in the case of the SRBI, this instrument represented an innovative way to attract capital flow from abroad during a period of high credit costs and slow investment. Approximately 20.77 percent, or Rp 85.02 trillion (US$ 5.26 billion), of the total outstanding SRBI were owned by non-Indonesian residents, underscoring the SRBI’s success as a monetary instrument.
Even when compared to other countries in the same region, the Indonesian finance sector stands out for its stability against fluctuations. Throughout 2023, the global cost of credit was high due to hawkish Fed policies made to curb US inflation, resulting in a stagnation of capital flow on a global scale. Entering the second quarter of 2024, the composite index of many Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand recorded price decreases compared to the same period last year, reaching -3.96 percent and -13.9 percent on the Straits Times Index (STI) and the Bangkok SET index, respectively. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Stock Exchange Composite Index (JKSE) recorded a price increase of 5.18 percent for the same one-year period.
In summary, the Indonesian financial sector stands out for its stability and consistency, maintaining growth through innovation even during periods of austerity or global uncertainty. This consistency is also reflected in its GDP, which grew by 7.4 percent from 2022 to 2023, contributing roughly 4.16 percent to the national GDP in 2023.
Latest News
Danantara Indonesia has announced plans to consolidate 15 state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and their logistics arms into a single “super” logistics entity in an effort to address longstanding structural issues in Indonesia’s state-owned logistics sector. The consolidation spans multiple segments, from railway distribution to fertilizer distribution, and combines both profitable and loss-making firms under the ambition of building a more integrated and efficient national logistics backbone.
According to the plan, the consolidation includes Pupuk Indonesia Logistik and Semen Indonesia Logistik, both of which recorded significant losses in their recent financial reports. Pupuk Indonesia Logistik posted losses of Rp 90.52 billion (US5.24 million) in 2024, while Semen Indonesia Logistik reported losses of Rp 30.29 billion in the same year, which then widened to Rp 188.35 billion in 2025.
This financial strain is closely tied to policy mandates imposed on these firms. In the case of Pupuk Indonesia and its logistics arm, subsidized fertilizer is sold at government-set prices that remain far below market rates, even as the cost of imported raw materials such as phosphate rock and diammonium phosphate, along with other feedstocks, has risen in recent years. Prices initially surged during the pandemic and increased again amid conflict in the Middle East. This persistent mismatch between controlled selling prices and rising production and distribution costs, compounded by the large volumes required under Indonesia’s subsidy program, has continued to pressure margins across the fertilizer supply chain.
A similar pattern can be seen at Semen Indonesia and its logistics subsidiary, which have played a major role in supporting large-scale infrastructure development, particularly projects classified under the government’s National Strategic Projects (PSN) program introduced during the administration of former president Joko “Jokowi” Widodo. While these projects have generated demand for cement and logistics services, many have operated under thin margins or even losses due to pricing pressures and execution constraints. As a result, participation in these state-driven initiatives has not always translated into financial sustainability, contributing to the broader pattern of losses across construction and logistics SOEs.
On the other end of the spectrum, several profitable logistics SOEs are expected to help offset weaker entities under the consolidation scheme. These include Pos Indonesia, which will serve as the holding company for the new logistics entity, alongside Pelindo Terminal Petikemas, ASDP Indonesia Ferry, Pelni, KAI Logistik and Integrasi Logistik Cipta Solusi. All of these companies have recorded consistent profits since at least 2023.
However, this profitability is not necessarily the result of stronger operational efficiency or healthy market competition. While struggling SOEs face rigid policies that suppress margins through subsidized pricing schemes or participation in low-margin national projects, stronger-performing firms benefit from regulatory structures that grant them protected, and often exclusive, access to lucrative market segments.
Take Pos Indonesia as an example. Despite losing market share in the consumer parcel business to on-demand delivery services such as J&T Express and Shopee Express, its profitability remains supported by regulatory advantages. As the state postal operator, Pos Indonesia retains exclusive access to government social assistance distribution programs such as the Family Hope Program (PKH) and staple food packages (Sembako) in remote regions, handles official state documents and passport deliveries, and operates the country’s only nationwide postal financial network through PosPay under a universal service obligation mandate.
Similarly, Pelindo Terminal Petikemas functions as the dominant container terminal operator across major Indonesian ports following the 2021 merger of Pelindo. Its profitability is supported by regulations that consolidate container handling operations under its network, leaving shippers with limited alternatives.
The same dynamic applies to ASDP Indonesia Ferry, which maintains a statutory monopoly over most roll-on/roll-off ferry routes connecting Sumatra, Java, Bali and other major islands. Private operators cannot enter these strategic routes without government approval, making ASDP’s profitability heavily reliant on regulatory protection.
The remaining seven logistics SOEs involved in the consolidation have not publicly disclosed their financial statements. They include Pelindo Solusi Logistik, Garuda Indonesia Logistik, Varuna Tirta Prakasya, Djakarta Lloyd, BGR Logistik Indonesia, Angkasa Pura Kargo and Aerojasa Cargo.
Unless the government addresses the dependence of some SOEs on policy protection to remain profitable, while easing the pricing pressures that continue to burden struggling firms, the merger risks becoming a bailout mechanism that masks inefficiencies rather than resolving them.
