Sector

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

View more

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

With fintech paving the way forward, traditional banking followed suit by revolutionizing its services. From 2022 to 2023, the banking industry’s fund distribution increased by 6.28 percent, source of funds increased by 6.33 percent, and total assets in the industry grew by 6.98 percent, reaching a total of US$8.22 trillion. Moreover, even regional banks have been benefitting from this wave of innovation. For the same period from 2022 to 2023, the regional banking sector saw a 7.67 percent in distributed funds, an 8.08 percent increase in source of funds, and a 7.52 percent increase in total assets, reaching a total of US$137.96 billion.

Innovations in Indonesia’s finance sector extend beyond financial services. On September 2023, the Indonesian monetary authority, Bank Indonesia (BI), introduced three pro-market monetary instruments that function as short-term fixed income securities with high coupon rates. The three instruments, SRBI, SUVBI, and SUVBI, were able to collect Rp 409 trillion (US$25.2 billion), US$2.31 billion, and US$387 million, respectively.

Particularly in the case of the SRBI, this instrument represented an innovative way to attract capital flow from abroad during a period of high credit costs and slow investment. Approximately 20.77 percent, or Rp 85.02 trillion (US$ 5.26 billion), of the total outstanding SRBI were owned by non-Indonesian residents, underscoring the SRBI’s success as a monetary instrument.

Even when compared to other countries in the same region, the Indonesian finance sector stands out for its stability against fluctuations. Throughout 2023, the global cost of credit was high due to hawkish Fed policies made to curb US inflation, resulting in a stagnation of capital flow on a global scale. Entering the second quarter of 2024, the composite index of many Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand recorded price decreases compared to the same period last year, reaching -3.96 percent and -13.9 percent on the Straits Times Index (STI) and the Bangkok SET index, respectively. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Stock Exchange Composite Index (JKSE) recorded a price increase of 5.18 percent for the same one-year period.

In summary, the Indonesian financial sector stands out for its stability and consistency, maintaining growth through innovation even during periods of austerity or global uncertainty. This consistency is also reflected in its GDP, which grew by 7.4 percent from 2022 to 2023, contributing roughly 4.16 percent to the national GDP in 2023.

Latest News

July 16, 2026

The armed conflict plaguing Papua has intensified sharply over the past two weeks, compounding decades of violence that have long gripped the region. This latest escalation has once again prompted widespread calls for restraint, peaceful dialogue and a nonviolent approach to resolving the protracted crisis.

To date, the ongoing hostilities have claimed thousands of lives and driven the number of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Papua to an estimated 122,000. While the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB), the armed wing of the Free Papua Movement (OPM), has been blamed for a series of recent attacks, the operations conducted by the Indonesian Military (TNI) have also come under increasing scrutiny.

According to recent monitoring, much of the latest violence has been concentrated in the Sugapa and Agisiga districts of Intan Jaya, a mountainous regency in Central Papua.

The resulting toll highlights a grim pattern that began on June 27, when a soldier was killed and three others wounded. Two days later on June 29, three separate incidents resulted in the deaths of a church worker and a pastor, while two workers building a church in Titigi village were injured in a shooting. The bloodshed continued to July 2, when three other incidents claimed the lives of a pregnant woman, a church worker and a pastor.

A common thread running through these tragedies is the critical need for thorough, impartial investigations as competing narratives frequently obscure the truth. A stark example is the death of Melkiana Duwotau, who was pregnant when a bullet pierced the wall of her honai (traditional house) and struck her in the head, killing her.

The Intan Jaya administration reported that the gunfire was believed to have originated from the direction of a nearby TNI post. The military denied this, however, and the Habema Joint Regional Defense Command (Koops Habema) alleged that the shots were fired by an armed separatist group.

Questions also surround the July 2 death of church worker Okto Tigau, whom the military had identified as a member of an armed separatist group. Local accounts, however, described him as an ordinary civilian. The Papua office of the National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) said it received reports that Tigau had been missing since June 29. Two days later, his body was discovered with multiple stab wounds. Local sources allege he had been detained by security personnel.

The July 2 violence was not confined to Intan Jaya. In an incident that drew international attention, United States national Nicholas Francis Gosselin, a pilot with PT Associated Mission Aviation (AMA), was shot dead by separatist rebels after landing in Yahukimo, Papua Highlands. The attackers subsequently set his aircraft on fire.

Unlike other recent incidents, responsibility for this attack was openly claimed: TPNPB spokesperson Sebby Sambom said Gosselin’s killing was intended to send a "message" to both Jakarta and Washington over their failure to address the root causes of the conflict between the rebel group and the TNI. Sambom also alleged that the aircraft had repeatedly transported military personnel, violating the group’s ultimatum.

The tragedy recalls the high-profile hostage incident involving New Zealand pilot Phillip Mehrtens, who was abducted by Papuan rebels in February 2023 after landing a small commercial aircraft in Papua Highlands’ remote Nduga district. After more than a year in captivity, Mehrtens was finally released in September 2024.

The latest surge in bloodshed has renewed urgent calls from religious groups, as well as the legislature and the executive branch, for concrete de-escalation efforts.

The Indonesian Communion of Churches (PGI) has urged all parties to end all forms of violence and called for the immediate pursuit of peaceful dialogue as the only sustainable path forward. In the House of Representatives, Commission XIII member Yan Permenas Mandenas has called on the TNI commander to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of security operations across the volatile mountainous regions of Papua.

Meanwhile, the executive leadership has emphasized restraint and systemic reform. Deputy Human Rights Minister Mugiyanto called on both the TNI and the National Police to exercise maximum restraint. Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai likewise stressed that achieving lasting peace in Papua could not be the responsibility of a single institution or ministry, arguing instead that a durable solution required the commitment and participation of all stakeholders.

Ultimately, this latest wave of violence serves as a stark reminder that the Papua conflict cannot be resolved through force alone. As competing narratives continue to emerge and civilians bear the brunt of the toll, ensuring strict accountability for each incident while creating space for credible, structured dialogue remains the only viable way to break a cycle of conflict that has persisted since the 1960s.

Read more
Load more