Sector
Finance
Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.
View moreFinance
Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.
With fintech paving the way forward, traditional banking followed suit by revolutionizing its services. From 2022 to 2023, the banking industry’s fund distribution increased by 6.28 percent, source of funds increased by 6.33 percent, and total assets in the industry grew by 6.98 percent, reaching a total of US$8.22 trillion. Moreover, even regional banks have been benefitting from this wave of innovation. For the same period from 2022 to 2023, the regional banking sector saw a 7.67 percent in distributed funds, an 8.08 percent increase in source of funds, and a 7.52 percent increase in total assets, reaching a total of US$137.96 billion.
Innovations in Indonesia’s finance sector extend beyond financial services. On September 2023, the Indonesian monetary authority, Bank Indonesia (BI), introduced three pro-market monetary instruments that function as short-term fixed income securities with high coupon rates. The three instruments, SRBI, SUVBI, and SUVBI, were able to collect Rp 409 trillion (US$25.2 billion), US$2.31 billion, and US$387 million, respectively.
Particularly in the case of the SRBI, this instrument represented an innovative way to attract capital flow from abroad during a period of high credit costs and slow investment. Approximately 20.77 percent, or Rp 85.02 trillion (US$ 5.26 billion), of the total outstanding SRBI were owned by non-Indonesian residents, underscoring the SRBI’s success as a monetary instrument.
Even when compared to other countries in the same region, the Indonesian finance sector stands out for its stability against fluctuations. Throughout 2023, the global cost of credit was high due to hawkish Fed policies made to curb US inflation, resulting in a stagnation of capital flow on a global scale. Entering the second quarter of 2024, the composite index of many Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand recorded price decreases compared to the same period last year, reaching -3.96 percent and -13.9 percent on the Straits Times Index (STI) and the Bangkok SET index, respectively. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Stock Exchange Composite Index (JKSE) recorded a price increase of 5.18 percent for the same one-year period.
In summary, the Indonesian financial sector stands out for its stability and consistency, maintaining growth through innovation even during periods of austerity or global uncertainty. This consistency is also reflected in its GDP, which grew by 7.4 percent from 2022 to 2023, contributing roughly 4.16 percent to the national GDP in 2023.
Latest News
The recent announcement on 5.6 percent economic growth came as little surprise after Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa made a similar projection in February. At first glance, the figure appears to validate President Prabowo Subianto’s economic agenda, particularly the free nutritious meal program. Yet behind the stable headline growth, macroeconomic indicators suggest the economy is becoming increasingly dependent on government spending and monetary expansion rather than healthy private sector activity.
First-quarter growth was driven primarily by government expenditure, which surged 21.81 percent year-on-year (yoy) despite contributing only 6.72 percent to gross domestic product. Household consumption, the backbone of Indonesia’s economy, meanwhile grew a more modest 5.52 percent, and other growth components also remained relatively weak. This imbalance suggests that economic expansion is being propped up by fiscal stimulus rather than broad-based recovery.
A major driver of the spending increase was the rollout of the free meals program, as reflected by the 13.14 percent growth in the accommodation and food services sector. However, the program comes with a significant fiscal burden: government expenditure increased 16.6 percent while regional transfers were cut 25.5 percent in the 2026 state budget.
The effectiveness of the free meals program also remains unclear. The government has yet to publish a comprehensive report about its impact on health and nutrition outcomes. What is already visible, however, is the growing pressure it has placed on fiscal sustainability. In the first quarter alone, the program spent Rp 55.3 trillion (US$3.2 billion), or around 1.6 percent of GDP. This is far above what India spends on a comparable program, which amounts to roughly 0.06 percent of its GDP.
The widening fiscal burden is becoming more difficult to ignore. Government expenditure expanded 31.4 percent while state revenue grew only 10.5 percent. The crowding out effect of the free meals program therefore extends beyond fiscal space, potentially affecting regional development, inflation and even the government’s long-term credibility.
Inflationary pressure already has become more apparent. Since the free meals program expanded in mid-2025, food prices have remained elevated, as Coordinating Food Minister Zulkifli Hasan has acknowledged. By April 2026, the inflation rate had risen to 2.42 percent, up from 1.95 percent a year earlier. Food and beverage inflation reached 3.06 percent, reflecting stronger demand generated by government spending.
This inflationary impact has been reinforced by rapid monetary expansion. As of April 2026, base money growth reached 11.8 percent yoy while adjusted base money grew at an even faster 16.8 percent, after a prolonged period of subdued single-digit growth. The widening gap between the two indicators signals increasingly aggressive liquidity expansion by Bank Indonesia (BI). This aligns with the commitment of BI Governor Perry Warjiyo to maintain base money growth within the 10-12 percent range.
In practice, however, the policy increasingly resembles indirect money printing to sustain fiscal expansion and support flagship programs. The added liquidity is not translating into stronger private sector activity. Credit growth has remained below 10 percent since last year, while third-party funds (DPK) have consistently grown faster than loans since November 2025 to reach 13.6 percent, compared to credit growth of just 9.5 percent.
Ironically, Purbaya once acknowledged when he was head of the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS) that such a pattern typically signaled economic weakening. Yet the government appears increasingly uncertain about how to address the root causes of sluggish credit demand. Instead of tackling underlying weaknesses, it has continued injecting capital into state-owned banks to around Rp 100 trillion in March.
Rather than stimulating productive activity, the rapid increase in money supply has instead intensified pressure on the rupiah. Over the past year, the national currency has weakened against major currencies including the United States dollar, the Singapore dollar, the Chinese yuan and the euro. The rupiah even slipped beyond 17,400 per US dollar, prompting Prabowo to summon key economic officials, including representatives from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), BI and the Finance Ministry.
The weakening rupiah reflects deeper concerns over policy credibility. Financial markets ultimately respond not only to growth figures but also to the sustainability of the policies behind them. When growth increasingly relies on state spending and monetary expansion while household purchasing power and private investment remain fragile, investor confidence inevitably weakens.
