Sector

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

View more

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

With fintech paving the way forward, traditional banking followed suit by revolutionizing its services. From 2022 to 2023, the banking industry’s fund distribution increased by 6.28 percent, source of funds increased by 6.33 percent, and total assets in the industry grew by 6.98 percent, reaching a total of US$8.22 trillion. Moreover, even regional banks have been benefitting from this wave of innovation. For the same period from 2022 to 2023, the regional banking sector saw a 7.67 percent in distributed funds, an 8.08 percent increase in source of funds, and a 7.52 percent increase in total assets, reaching a total of US$137.96 billion.

Innovations in Indonesia’s finance sector extend beyond financial services. On September 2023, the Indonesian monetary authority, Bank Indonesia (BI), introduced three pro-market monetary instruments that function as short-term fixed income securities with high coupon rates. The three instruments, SRBI, SUVBI, and SUVBI, were able to collect Rp 409 trillion (US$25.2 billion), US$2.31 billion, and US$387 million, respectively.

Particularly in the case of the SRBI, this instrument represented an innovative way to attract capital flow from abroad during a period of high credit costs and slow investment. Approximately 20.77 percent, or Rp 85.02 trillion (US$ 5.26 billion), of the total outstanding SRBI were owned by non-Indonesian residents, underscoring the SRBI’s success as a monetary instrument.

Even when compared to other countries in the same region, the Indonesian finance sector stands out for its stability against fluctuations. Throughout 2023, the global cost of credit was high due to hawkish Fed policies made to curb US inflation, resulting in a stagnation of capital flow on a global scale. Entering the second quarter of 2024, the composite index of many Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand recorded price decreases compared to the same period last year, reaching -3.96 percent and -13.9 percent on the Straits Times Index (STI) and the Bangkok SET index, respectively. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Stock Exchange Composite Index (JKSE) recorded a price increase of 5.18 percent for the same one-year period.

In summary, the Indonesian financial sector stands out for its stability and consistency, maintaining growth through innovation even during periods of austerity or global uncertainty. This consistency is also reflected in its GDP, which grew by 7.4 percent from 2022 to 2023, contributing roughly 4.16 percent to the national GDP in 2023.

Latest News

June 15, 2026

The administration of President Prabowo Subianto has issued Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 26/2026, which expands the role of public service agencies (BLU) in energy imports, blurring the traditional boundaries between government agencies, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private sector players. While the new regulation appears intended to strengthen Indonesia’s energy security amid growing global uncertainties, it could create overlapping responsibilities, increase operational risks and expose the country to greater geopolitical pressures.

Article 2 of the Perpres states that the regulation’s aim is to maintain good governance in the procurement of crude oil, fuel oil (BBM) and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), whether sourced domestically or imported. It also seeks to improve the continuity, reliability and resilience of the national energy supply.

Under Article 4, imports of oil and gas products, including gasoline and LPG, may be conducted through agreements between Indonesia and foreign governments, cooperation between the government and foreign energy producers or partnerships between domestic energy companies and overseas suppliers, subject to certain restrictions.

Article 4 further stipulates that imports under bilateral cooperation schemes may be executed either by energy SOEs such as Pertamina or by the Oil and Gas Testing Center (Lemigas) of the Energy and Mineral Resources Ministry. It also authorizes the government to direct Lemigas to import oil and gas products to support strategic energy reserves and operational stockpiles.

During emergencies, Article 5 allows Lemigas and energy SOEs to independently procure oil and gas if domestic supplies are disrupted by geopolitical developments, price surges due to supply fluctuations or domestic reserves fall below established thresholds. The article also permits import contracts to include price differences based on volume, product type, country of origin and delivery schedules.

Meanwhile, Article 9 allows Lemigas, energy SOEs and private energy companies to import oil and gas products for storing in Free Trade and Free Port Zones (KPBPB) such as Batam or at bonded logistics centers (PLB). These facilities provide logistics and storage services while allowing deferred payment of selected duties, taxes and excise.

Granting Lemigas the authority to import oil and gas products marks a significant departure from the center’s traditional role. Historically, Lemigas has focused on research, certification, consulting, field surveys and testing services for the oil and gas industry.

The energy ministry says this expanded authority is intended to facilitate government-to-government (G2G) energy transactions, including potential agreements with Russia that could involve as much as 150 million barrels of crude oil.

Economists have argued that the new regulation risks creating overlapping procurement responsibilities between Pertamina and Lemigas, now designated as a public service agency. Assigning a commercial function outside the center’s core expertise could increase the risk of execution failures, complicate coordination in oil and gas procurement and distract Lemigas from its primary functions of research and testing.

Industry players have also suggested that granting import authority to Lemigas may serve as a way to bypass certain procurement restrictions Pertamina faces. The state-owned energy giant previously issued global bonds in the United States that restrict its involvement in illicit oil transactions, including purchases from countries such as Russia that are subject to sanctions by the US and its allies.

The energy ministry has acknowledged that facilitating such transactions is among the considerations behind the policy.

Meanwhile, National Energy Council (DEN) member Muhammad Kholid said the oil and gas that Lemigas imported could be stored at SOE-owned facilities, including those operated by Pertamina subsidiary PT Pertamina Patra Niaga or private energy companies. However, Kholid encouraged Lemigas to prioritize facilities run by SOEs, arguing that storage costs could be minimized through adjustments to asset use arrangements approved by the Finance Ministry.

Allowing Lemigas to import oil and gas products reflects the government’s concern over potential energy supply disruptions amid the country’s continuing dependence on fossil fuels. However, this policy should have been introduced earlier and tested through Pertamina before actually authorizing an institution with limited experience in commercial procurement.

Moreover, facilitating transactions involving sanctioned producers risks drawing needless scrutiny from Washington and its allies. It may also create a perception of foreign policy inconsistency following the significant concessions in Indonesia recently extended to the US.

Read more
Load more