Sector

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

View more

Finance

Indonesia’s financial sector has been flourishing over the past half decade. The COVID-19 pandemic period, while being a time of austerity for most sectors, led to revolutionary innovations in Indonesia’s financial services industry, particularly in fintech. From December 2020 to December 2022, total assets of the fintech sector grew by 48.54 percent from 2020 to 2022. This growing trend continued even after the pandemic lockdowns ended, as total assets in fintech grew by 30.8 percent from December 2022 to December 2023.

With fintech paving the way forward, traditional banking followed suit by revolutionizing its services. From 2022 to 2023, the banking industry’s fund distribution increased by 6.28 percent, source of funds increased by 6.33 percent, and total assets in the industry grew by 6.98 percent, reaching a total of US$8.22 trillion. Moreover, even regional banks have been benefitting from this wave of innovation. For the same period from 2022 to 2023, the regional banking sector saw a 7.67 percent in distributed funds, an 8.08 percent increase in source of funds, and a 7.52 percent increase in total assets, reaching a total of US$137.96 billion.

Innovations in Indonesia’s finance sector extend beyond financial services. On September 2023, the Indonesian monetary authority, Bank Indonesia (BI), introduced three pro-market monetary instruments that function as short-term fixed income securities with high coupon rates. The three instruments, SRBI, SUVBI, and SUVBI, were able to collect Rp 409 trillion (US$25.2 billion), US$2.31 billion, and US$387 million, respectively.

Particularly in the case of the SRBI, this instrument represented an innovative way to attract capital flow from abroad during a period of high credit costs and slow investment. Approximately 20.77 percent, or Rp 85.02 trillion (US$ 5.26 billion), of the total outstanding SRBI were owned by non-Indonesian residents, underscoring the SRBI’s success as a monetary instrument.

Even when compared to other countries in the same region, the Indonesian finance sector stands out for its stability against fluctuations. Throughout 2023, the global cost of credit was high due to hawkish Fed policies made to curb US inflation, resulting in a stagnation of capital flow on a global scale. Entering the second quarter of 2024, the composite index of many Southeast Asian countries such as Singapore and Thailand recorded price decreases compared to the same period last year, reaching -3.96 percent and -13.9 percent on the Straits Times Index (STI) and the Bangkok SET index, respectively. Meanwhile, the Jakarta Stock Exchange Composite Index (JKSE) recorded a price increase of 5.18 percent for the same one-year period.

In summary, the Indonesian financial sector stands out for its stability and consistency, maintaining growth through innovation even during periods of austerity or global uncertainty. This consistency is also reflected in its GDP, which grew by 7.4 percent from 2022 to 2023, contributing roughly 4.16 percent to the national GDP in 2023.

Latest News

September 14, 2026

The government’s latest changes to the import regime have expanded the range of food and agricultural products subject to tighter import controls, creating bottlenecks that are raising input costs and constraining supply. At the same time, weaker-than-expected demand from the Free Nutritious Meals (MBG) programme has left producers facing pressure from both sides: higher production costs and limited demand for their output.

The changes stem primarily from Permendag No. 11/2026, which expanded the list of agricultural commodities subject to import licensing from seven to 11 categories. The additions include soybean meal, feed wheat, broken rice for feed, mung beans and peanuts, bringing previously less-regulated agricultural inputs under the import approval regime.

Under the revised regime, importers of these commodities can no longer rely solely on the general import licensing process. They must meet additional requirements before their imports can be approved. For commodities subject to a commodity balance, such as sugar and corn, the government first determines import requirements and allocates import volumes. For other controlled commodities, importers must obtain additional technical recommendations from the relevant ministry before an Import Approval can be issued. These additional layers of approval have created bottlenecks and, in turn, supply constraints, particularly when government assessments and inter-ministerial coordination fail to keep pace with businesses’ demand for raw materials.

These bottlenecks can ultimately feed through into higher food prices. Statistics Indonesia (BPS) data for August showed food inflation at 4.22 percent year-on-year, above headline inflation of 3.19 percent. At the same time, food producers are facing pressure from both sides of the supply chain: higher input costs and uncertainty over the prices they can obtain for their output. Producer prices in the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sector rose 3.79 percent year-on-year in the second quarter, while the government has warned that tighter supplies, elevated global commodity prices and worsening drought conditions could put further pressure on production costs and food prices.

The impact is particularly significant for industries that depend heavily on agricultural inputs such as animal feed, where higher costs can quickly squeeze producers’ margins. The inclusion of soybean meal and feed wheat in the import control regime was particularly unexpected given their importance as key feed ingredients and the limited availability of domestic substitutes. The poultry sector is among the industries most exposed to the regulatory shift, having already been undergoing efforts to strengthen domestic production and develop the local supply chain.

The initial push to strengthen the poultry industry was driven in part by expectations that demand for poultry products would rise with the expansion of the MBG programme. However, the programme has so far been unable to absorb additional supply as quickly as expected. This has contributed to a supply surplus and put downward pressure on farm-gate prices, leaving poultry farmers caught between rising feed costs on the input side and weaker-than-expected demand on the output side.

The pressure on farmers reached a critical point last month. In August, thousands of poultry farmers in Central Java, Yogyakarta and South Sulawesi staged protests over falling egg prices and rising feed costs. In Kendal, Central Java, farmers reported that egg prices had fallen to Rp19,000–20,000 (US$1.08–1.14) per kilogram, well below the Rp26,500 level they considered viable. At the same time, the prices of corn and soybean meal, key feed ingredients for laying hens, had risen by around 25 percent. With feed accounting for about 70 percent of laying-hen production costs, farmers said the combination was severely squeezing their margins and pushing some producers to the brink of bankruptcy.

Since June, the Agriculture Ministry’s Directorate General of Livestock and Animal Health has been urging the National Nutrition Agency (BGN) to increase the use of eggs in MBG meals, as egg production has been growing faster than market absorption. The ministry’s intervention highlights the extent to which the agriculture sector has come to rely on the MBG programme to strengthen downstream demand and absorb excess production, even as farmers continue to face rising costs on the input side. Without sufficient demand to absorb domestic output, efforts to expand poultry production risk leaving farmers caught between higher production costs and prices that remain too low to sustain their operations.

Read more
Load more