Latest News
Escalating geopolitical tensions between Iran and the United States-Israel are putting pressure on global oil markets and pushing many economies into a defensive stance. Against this backdrop, Finance Minister, Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa, has maintained an outwardly optimistic outlook, projecting economic growth of 5.7 percent in the first quarter of 2026. Yet such confidence has been met with caution from economists and market participants. The concern is not merely how the government spends, but at what cost to fiscal credibility.
Purbaya has argued that a “healthy” fiscal position must be actively deployed to sustain economic momentum. In an environment marked by uncertainty and sensitive investor sentiment, however, the gap between policy ambition and policy credibility becomes increasingly critical. Can Indonesia pursue higher growth without undermining the stability on which that growth depends?
Economists, in particular, offer a more cautious assessment of Indonesia’s current trajectory. Rather than signaling a robust recovery, they point to underlying vulnerabilities, especially in fiscal management and investor confidence. A survey conducted by the Indonesian Institute of Economics and Business (LPEM FEB UI), which gathered responses from 85 economists, reveals growing skepticism toward the government’s fiscal stance. The survey shows that a significant majority, 67 respondents, expressed doubts about the government’s ability to maintain its fiscal deficit target while preserving the quality of spending. Such consensus, according to LPEM, is rare among economists, underscoring the depth of concern surrounding fiscal credibility.
Recent revisions of Indonesia’s outlook from positive to negative by international credit rating agencies such as Fitch Ratings and Moody’s serve as early warning signals for the country’s fiscal outlook. These agencies have highlighted priority programs such as the free nutritious meal (MBG) program and the Red and White Cooperatives (KMP) scheme as potential sources of additional fiscal strain, particularly if they fail to generate sufficient multiplier effects on employment or household purchasing power.
These concerns are compounded by mounting macroeconomic pressures. Statistics Indonesia (BPS) recorded annual inflation at 4.76 percent in February 2026, while the fiscal deficit has widened to Rp 135.7 trillion (US$8 billion). Moreover, the 2026 budget assumes an oil price of $70 per barrel, but the Iran conflict has pushed prices to around $100 per barrel. Each $1 increase in global oil prices is estimated to add approximately Rp 6.7 trillion to the fiscal burden, highlighting Indonesia’s exposure to external shocks.
Against this backdrop of skepticism, recent macroeconomic indicators present a more nuanced picture. Data from Bank Indonesia suggest that, from a monetary and financial standpoint, the economy remained relatively resilient prior to the US-Israeli war with Iran, which began on Feb. 28. Credit growth reached 9.96 percent in January 2026, indicating that businesses were gradually regaining confidence. This was supported by a stable and well-capitalized banking sector, alongside continued strength in consumption reflected in the expansion of digital transactions. These trends suggest that, despite prevailing concerns, parts of the economy continue to exhibit underlying momentum, raising the question whether this resilience can be sustained.
Still, Purbaya has pushed back firmly against recession concerns, dismissing them as overly pessimistic. He maintains that Indonesia’s economy is not deteriorating but rather recovering from last year’s pressures. To support this view, he points to key indicators such as the manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI), which rose to 53.8 in February 2026, its highest level in two years. The Mandiri Spending Index (MSI) has also trended upward to 360.7, alongside a 12.2 percent increase in car sales. Taken together, these figures suggest a strengthening recovery rather than an economy on the brink of contraction.
From a data perspective, Indonesia’s economic engine does appear to be gaining traction. However, much of the momentum observed in the first quarter of 2026 is likely driven by seasonal factors, particularly the overlapping effects of the Lunar New Year, the Muslim fasting month of Ramadan and the Idul Fitri holidays. During this period, consumption typically surges, production accelerates and financial activity intensifies, creating the impression of a broad-based recovery. Yet this momentum is inherently cyclical. The boost from holiday-related spending such as the disbursement of Idul Fitri bonuses and social assistance is temporary and unlikely to persist beyond the festive period.
The key question, therefore, is whether Indonesia can sustain this momentum amid ongoing global geopolitical tensions. This is where the divide between optimism and underlying reality becomes more apparent. While the government’s confidence is not entirely unfounded, much of the supporting data reflects temporary momentum rather than structural strength. Persistent challenges remain unresolved. In this context, achieving growth in the range of 5.5 to 5.7 percent in the first quarter may be within reach, but sustaining that pace over the remainder of the year presents a far more complex challenge. Ultimately, the question is not whether Indonesia can grow, but whether it can do so consistently and on a more durable foundation.
